Infrastructure audit

Infrastructure & Cloud Audit for AWS, Azure, Microsoft 365 & DevOps Environments

Identify hidden cloud waste, security gaps, reliability risks and governance issues before they become outages or financial loss — with deliverables leadership and engineering can both act on.

Request AuditBook Discovery Call

14+ Years Experience · AWS / Azure / Microsoft 365 · DevOps & Infrastructure Operations · Enterprise Governance & Automation

Read-onlyReview model

Non-disruptive access — no production changes during the audit phase.

NDAStandard practice

Mutual confidentiality before detailed scoping or system access.

1–3 weeksTypical timeline

Scoped to estate size, access model and cloud plus identity coverage.

Dual audienceDeliverables

Executive summary for leadership and engineering-ready remediation detail.

Reality check

Most Companies Don't Realize They Have These Problems

Silent waste and risk compound until an outage, audit, or invoice forces a reaction. A structured review surfaces them early.

Overprovisioned AWS/Azure resources

High monthly cloud bills

Weak backup & disaster recovery

No infrastructure governance

Missing monitoring & alerting

Poor IAM/security practices

Manual operational processes

No cost visibility

Unstable deployments

No scaling strategy

Microsoft 365 license waste

Weak endpoint governance

Scope

What Is Included in the Audit

Categorized coverage across cloud, delivery, security and productivity platforms — aligned to how modern enterprises actually operate.

Cloud infrastructure

  • AWS architecture review
  • Azure architecture review
  • Networking & security review
  • Load balancer & scaling analysis
  • Compute & storage optimization
  • Backup & disaster recovery validation
  • Monitoring & logging review
  • High availability assessment

DevOps & operations

  • CI/CD pipeline review
  • Infrastructure as Code maturity
  • Deployment safety review
  • Incident response readiness
  • Environment separation
  • Automation opportunities
  • Release reliability assessment

Security & governance

  • IAM review
  • Least privilege analysis
  • MFA & access control validation
  • Audit logging review
  • Compliance readiness
  • Governance & tagging strategy
  • Risk exposure analysis

Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace

  • License optimization
  • Identity & access review
  • Conditional access validation
  • Endpoint governance
  • Intune / device management
  • Exchange & collaboration risks
  • User lifecycle management

Deliverables

What You Receive

Documentation leadership and engineering can both use — with clear prioritization, not a generic checklist.

Executive Summary

A concise leadership view: top risks, cost opportunities, reliability gaps and recommended sequencing — so decisions happen before engineering backlog grooming.

Risk Assessment

Cost Optimization Findings

Architecture Review

Security Findings

Governance Gaps

Performance Bottlenecks

Prioritized Recommendations

Estimated Savings Opportunities

Modernization Roadmap

Quick Wins vs Long-Term Improvements

Outcomes

Typical Outcomes

Ranges depend on your starting point; the audit quantifies what is realistic for your estate and constraints.

Reduce cloud cost by 20–50%

Improve deployment reliability

Reduce operational overhead

Increase infrastructure visibility

Improve security posture

Reduce manual work through automation

Improve scaling readiness

Prepare for enterprise compliance

Methodology

Audit Process

A clear sequence from discovery through roadmap — so stakeholders know what to expect at each stage.

Discovery

Stakeholder interviews, scope confirmation and access planning aligned to your risk tolerance.

Access review

Secure read-only review of cloud, DevOps, monitoring and governance — coordinated with IT and security.

Analysis

Cross-functional assessment of cost, reliability, security and operational maturity with evidence.

Reporting

Structured audit report with severity, business impact and prioritized recommendations.

Roadmap

Sequenced improvement plan with quick wins, dependencies and optional implementation support.

Engagement

How Engagements Work

A straightforward path from first conversation to actionable report — with optional follow-through when you want execution support, not just recommendations.

  • Discovery call

    Scope, stakeholders, access model and timeline — no obligation to proceed.

  • Structured audit

    Read-only review with evidence-backed findings and severity-ranked recommendations.

  • Implementation (optional)

    Focused execution phase or advisory support to deliver the roadmap.

Illustrative examples

Real-World Audit Insights

Anonymous composites — representative of multi-cloud, AI-adjacent and identity-heavy reviews. Findings are severity-ranked with business impact and recommendations.

AI / ML platform

AI platform infrastructure review

Series B AI startup running inference and batch workloads across AWS with rising GPU spend and on-call fatigue.

AWSEKSGPU nodesCloudWatchTerraform

Key findings

  • Oversized GPU nodes with idle capacity outside peak inference windows
  • Autoscaling policies tuned for CPU, not queue depth or token latency
  • Missing SLO signals for inference paths and embedding pipelines
  • Runbooks and ownership unclear during queue backlogs
  • Backup and DR paths untested for vector and model artifact stores

Outcomes delivered

  • Right-sized GPU pools with queue-aware scaling signals
  • Reduced monthly compute spend without sacrificing SLA headroom
  • Clearer on-call playbooks for inference and batch failures
  • Executive view of cost drivers tied to product usage
28% identifiedCompute waste
11 prioritizedCritical findings
5 in 30 daysQuick wins

Multi-cloud SaaS

Multi-cloud SaaS estate review

B2B SaaS provider operating AWS production and Azure staging with Terraform sprawl and rising egress costs.

AWSAzureTerraformGitLab CIGrafana

Key findings

  • Terraform modules forked per team with inconsistent tagging and state hygiene
  • Cross-cloud networking paths driving avoidable egress and NAT charges
  • CI/CD promotion gaps between staging and production environments
  • Alert routing split across CloudWatch and Grafana without ownership
  • Reserved capacity and savings plans misaligned to steady-state usage

Outcomes delivered

  • Unified IaC standards and state management approach
  • Network topology changes scoped to reduce recurring egress spend
  • Release promotion model with clearer environment parity
  • FinOps cadence shared between engineering and finance
22–35% / yrProjected savings
7 modulesIaC drift areas
9 flaggedReliability gaps

Identity & productivity

Microsoft 365 governance review

Mid-market organization with hybrid workforce, guest collaboration sprawl and audit pressure on access controls.

Entra IDIntuneExchange OnlineDefenderConditional Access

Key findings

  • Guest accounts and external collaboration without lifecycle or attestation
  • Conditional access policies incomplete for privileged and remote users
  • License tiers assigned broadly with measurable under-utilization
  • Intune compliance baselines inconsistent across device platforms
  • Exchange transport and retention rules misaligned to compliance needs

Outcomes delivered

  • Phased identity governance with guest and privileged access controls
  • License reclamation program with HR-aligned joiner-mover-leaver
  • Endpoint compliance reporting leadership can track monthly
  • Clearer path toward audit-ready access documentation
~18% recoverableLicense waste
14 itemsHigh-risk access
6 criticalPolicy gaps

Sample finding format

High

Backup restoration never tested

Risk level
Data loss / failed recovery
Business impact
Unprovable recovery objectives during a real incident
Recommendation
Tabletop plus automated restore validation on a schedule
High

No MFA enforcement for privileged roles

Risk level
Account takeover
Business impact
Regulatory exposure and operational lockout
Recommendation
Phased MFA rollout with conditional access and exceptions process
Medium

Idle compute running 24/7

Risk level
Recurring cost leakage
Business impact
Budget consumed without matching business value
Recommendation
Rightsizing, scheduling and autoscaling policy review
Medium

Monitoring gaps on critical paths

Risk level
Delayed incident detection
Business impact
Customer impact before engineering is paged
Recommendation
SLO-based alerting with ownership mapped to services

Illustrative examples only — not client-identifying data. Actual reports include evidence, severity and ownership mapping.

Fit

Best Suited For

Organizations where infrastructure cost, risk, or velocity is on leadership's radar.

  • SaaS companies
  • AI/LLM platforms
  • Startups scaling rapidly
  • Companies migrating to cloud
  • Microsoft 365 heavy organizations
  • Teams with rising cloud bills
  • Organizations with frequent downtime
  • Businesses without dedicated DevOps/SRE teams

Trust

Why Companies Work With Me

Practical engineering judgment — the kind you need when tradeoffs matter and budgets are real.

Real operational experience across production environments

Infrastructure-first mindset — not slide-deck theory

Focus on reliability, scalability and maintainability

Practical recommendations you can sequence and execute

Cost-aware architecture and FinOps-aligned findings

Security and governance awareness baked into the review

Depth across AWS, Azure and Microsoft ecosystems

AI infrastructure and inference-path awareness where relevant

FAQ

Common Questions

How long does the audit take?

Typical engagements range from one to three weeks depending on estate size, access model and scope (cloud-only vs. cloud plus identity/productivity). A fixed timeline is agreed during discovery.

Do you sign NDA agreements?

Yes. Mutual NDAs are standard before detailed discussions or read access to systems and documentation.

Is production access required?

Not always. Many findings come from architecture interviews, read-only access, exports and staging mirrors. Production read access can accelerate certain checks when policy allows.

Will the audit interrupt services?

No. Reviews are designed to be read-only and non-disruptive. Any suggested validation is coordinated and scoped to avoid customer impact.

Can you help implement recommendations?

Yes. Many clients move from audit into a focused implementation phase or a longer engagement for execution and governance follow-through.

Is this suitable for startups?

Yes — especially when cloud spend, reliability, or compliance pressure is outpacing internal bandwidth. Scoping is adjusted for smaller teams.

Do you support multi-cloud environments?

Yes. AWS, Azure, hybrid patterns and Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace are all in scope, including how identity and cost tie across providers.

Discover Infrastructure Risks Before They Become Expensive Problems

Start with a discovery call or send audit context through the contact page — detailed scoping happens before any access or commitment.

Request AuditSchedule Consultation